bw_girl_flowers.gif (1800 bytes)  Positive Suggestions for SCF Reform Legislation

Premises:

Oregon families will live happier, more secure lives when they no longer need worry about terrorism caused by overzealous SCF or law enforcement action. SCF agents will be able to do far more for families in the system if their caseload is substantially reduced. Both require more stringent filters, increased standards, and better accountability. Filters should be based on a definition of child abuse that is more generally acceptable than a singular bruise or welt. Accountability should be in the form of mandated recognition of harm caused by intervention, and through civil liability.

Suggested Filters:

A single injury which requires a physician's attention, such as a second or third degree burn, a broken bone, or open sores. (In such cases, the local law enforcement agency shall request immediate removal authorization from a judge. Law enforcement will have primary jurisdiction.) - OR -

Three or more separate incidents of willfully given bruises. A single report may be used as justification for an investigation in which additional reports are sought, through interviews of neighbors, teachers, or other family members. SOSCF shall have primary investigative jurisdiction, and may request a court order for a child's removal from the home.

Suggested Standards:

Suggested Accountability:

Please don’t forget that law enforcement practice needs to be specifically addressed: